On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:53:58AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: >On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:25:44AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> As I recall,this Extended Life Cycle feature is already defined to >> cover everything, so that wouldn't be necessary. > >I'm reading here: >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle#Detailed_Description > >I don't see any such definition. I also don't see a definition for >the length of time, or issue severity coverage. (The last of these, >to be fair, Jeroen explicitly asked us to weigh in on.) > >Furthermore: >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle#Scope > >There's an admonition that says, "Note that the following items may >only apply to those that opt-in on ELC support." That sounds pretty >open-ended too. If Jeroen and the rest of the group signed up on the >wiki page are interested in doing this in Fedora, they need to round >up those details and put them in the page for consideration. I spoke with Jeroen about that this morning. He said he was going to rework the wiki page soon. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
