Re: changing content licenses (OPL => CC BY SA)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "Karsten Wade" <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> My understanding when we did this last time was, "Since we are going
> to simultaneously get all of these people to sign the CLA, we now
> have
> a tool (hammer) that prevents us from having to ask permission if we
> need to relicense in the future."  As such, it hadn't occurred to me
> until Spot specified that we might have to get individual approval or
> remove the contribution.
> 
> Hmm, I'm not sure I recall having to remove wiki content, thank
> goodness.  IIRC, everyone who had wiki edit rights signed the CLA.
> The one exception was an author who worked on a stand-alone guide
> (Jargon Buster), who did not want to relicense nor sign the CLA, and
> his content was removed.
> 

As I remember it there were a couple other items that were removed by their authors before they gave up their respective wiki accounts.

-- Bob

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       Robert 'Bob' Jensen        ||       Fedora Unity Founder       |
|       bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx        ||      http://fedoraunity.org/     |
|                   http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/                   |
|                http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/bobjensen                |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux