Re: Proposal for ML conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 17 May 2009 10:35:13 +0100
Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Francesco Ugolini wrote:
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Paul W. Frields
> > <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > Meanwhile I think this isn't censorship: one of the best tools we
> > have to communicate are out M-Ls, and the only way to keep them
> > working is to control way:
> 
> For the Mailing Lists in General.
> If possible:
> A. Could replies to "Digest" be auto deleted, and reason sent to
> sender.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines 

This could be possible done via the mailman Spam filter rules. At least
for posts that don't change the subject, ie: 
Re: <listname> Digest, Vol*

> B: Likewise html

This could be done via mailman's content filtering settings. 

> Because both of above mean, some of the best people to answer User
> Q's, don't see them, they just delete them.

On fedora-list for example, yeah. 
fedora-devel doesn't seem to have nearly as much of this... 

> 
> Frank
> 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux