On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:17:24AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 11:27 +0200, Francesco Ugolini wrote: > > > > Maybe instead of Board members (that, like someone suggested could > > take their time), it could be useful let Board nominating someone > > else, out the board, to do this. > > > > We started with a board member mostly because nearly all the board > members are also subscribers to the fedora-devel-list in question, and > many others, making it easy to casually monitor the list as a party of > the daily reading anyway. > > We did however leave room for other non-board volunteers. Also -- and I think this may have been pointed out before -- fedora-devel-list is not the only list where we'd like to encourage more civil or even positive interactions. Our proposal wasn't so specific that a reasonable individual would think other lists are meant to be a free-for-all, but just for the sake of posterity I wanted to point it out. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
