On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:34 AM, John Poelstra <poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Seth Vidal said the following on 05/15/2009 09:56 AM Pacific Time: >> >> >> On Fri, 15 May 2009, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote: >> >>> >>> The consequence of this 'gift', is a severe aversion to words and phrases >>> meant to "beat around the bush", ie., hint at >>> the proper word, wherein such words might be offensive. >>> (Another consequence of such a gift, is an aversion to the 'willfully >>> ignorant'... ie., those who can learn but refuse >>> to. I find this group offensive regardless of their intelligence/lack >>> thereof) >>> >>> Hence, when talking to the average 'Joe Idiot', cursing is not only >>> commonplace, but demanded for quick and effective >>> communication. >>> >>> I will not censor myself/limit my ability to communicate to suit the P.C. >>> pussies. >>> Those who take offence to this can kiss my ass. >>> >>> I do not bow to oppression or censorship. >>> >>> I am a free man today, I will remain free at all costs. >> >> okay. you can be free. But you have to understand that if you're abusive >> or aggressive on fedora mailing lists then your posts will be moderated. >> > > And there have been cases when members of leadership bodies (FESCo and or > the Board) have met this criteria. Is it fair to assume that this proposal > is to sanction everyone equally regardless of position? Every single person on the Board should be leading by example, period. Paul _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
