On Fri, 8 May 2009, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Refer to: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Trademark_license_agreement > > Is this all you have to say about it? If so, you are proving what I > wrote previously: "Things like these are hard to understand. There might > be good reasons, but IMO the board does a bad job ATM in communicating > their views to the outside world." > I can't speak for the board but I'm pretty sure you're confusing legal constraints with the boards view. They don't write the law and I suspect at least some of them don't much like the laws they find themselves operating in. > I still don't get why Robert has to has to follow rules when mirroring > fpo if these rules not even apply to the fpo website itself. Why are > rules for community members stricter than for Red Hat or the Fedora > Project? How are we supposed to understand the meaning of the agreement, > when there are no translations? You cannot expect someone to sign a > contract if he doesn't even understand it's content. > I'd strongly recommend if you find anything you don't understand to discuss it with your lawyer. I'm a tech guy, not a legal guy so I don't bother pretending to understand how the law works. // just my two cents on the matter. -Mike _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
