On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:17:58AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/23/2009 03:02 AM, John Poelstra wrote: > > > ** One community member with very specific issues, trying to resolve > > them currently > > * Fedora Legal recently had to intervene in a misuse of "Fedora Remix" > > -- we do need to maintain vigilance > > Can more details be provided on these? In the latter case, someone created a Fedora Remix that was also given a name which was a violation of Red Hat's trademark guidelines. The party agreed to rename the remix distribution. The case serves as a reminder that, while the Fedora Remix mark is available for the community to create new combinations of software that draw from the Fedora Project, the resulting remixes are still subject to other applicable law or regulation. (For example, you couldn't name a Fedora Remix something like "Windows Plus.") -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpFrLkuSarR6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
