On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 08:24:07AM -0800, James Colgan wrote: > Thank you Paul for your explanation. > > I really do not want the donation feature to hold up progress we can make in > supporting Fedora and the FEL. It is the first time that we've contemplated > this type of feature and thought it would be attractive/helpful. I suggest > we decouple this from moving forward and put it on a parallel track as we > work through the process. > > Does that make sense? I think that's a fine and prudent idea, absolutely. The most important objective for Fedora, in this case, is that the FEL and Fedora are visible and relevant for EDA audiences worldwide, and that Chitlesh and other FEL and Fedora contributors are empowered to provide those resources to interested individuals and groups effectively, without substantial drain on Xuropa's resources. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpfCBYeo9DFG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
