Re: Election Townhall meeting feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06.12.2008 19:17, Francesco Ugolini wrote:
2008/12/6 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Josh Boyer wrote:
Matt has requested some feedback on the townhall meetings that are
being held for the various elections, so I thought I would start
a thread.
It would be useful, if we can have a round of Q&A on this mailing list along
similar lines as well. IRC timings don't work out well for everyone.
I totally agree with that proposal.

I'd actually go one step further and say a "Q&A via mail" is even more important then a townhall meeting on IRC, as that is more structured and makes it easier for the voters to read than a IRC log.

The way it IMHO should work is something like this: Ask people to send in a few questions (question like those that were asked on IRC), collect them, merge dupes, pick the most important ones (5 to 8 maybe) and let each nominee answer those questions (there needs to be a lenght limit to make sure everybody can read all answers in an acceptable timeframe). A townhall meeting in addition then might make sense to clarify things, but clarifying things via email could work as well.

Cu
knurd

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux