On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:50:40PM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > While we should certainly keep the schedule page in UTC, I'm not sure > > we should hold the users to fixed slots therein, as long as they > > keep it updated. > > This would feel better if we had a system with multiple irc > conferences rooms...equipped with logbots so meetings and participants > could just move to the next available room instead of trying to > walling into a room other meetings are using. We have other meeting rooms established (#fedora-meeting-{1..4}), but there are rarely people in them, whereas lots of people camp in the main #fedora-meeting. OTOH we keep meeting logs and summaries for a reason beyond simple transparency; they're also for reference by people who don't or can't make the meetings themselves. Whether it's a logbot or a wiki page, interested people do still have to read the content. /me continues arguing with himself. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgp5OzNQzNXxy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board