On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 11:51 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > FESCo, then the Board? Or the Board can delegate to FESCo? One of the > > two. > > Is this really Board fodder at all? I'm of the opinion that RelEng > oversight is completely and utterly FESCo's jurisdiction. If FESCo > wants to punt to the Board, okay I guess...but if FESCo can't come to > a decision on this... is the Board better equipped to do it? I really > really doubt we'd overrule FESCo's decision given the same public > discussion as context . No, this is a FESCo decision, just like in past releases. It would only be escalated to the Board, if for some unforeseeable reason FESCo couldn't come to a resolution. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
