On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 16:40 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 19:30 -0500, Brian Pepple wrote: > > Looks pretty reasonable to me. My big concern is if we slip for F11 > > (which given our past track record is fairly likely) we'll be reducing > > the F12 development cycle even more. > > Yep, that's always a concern. That's why I wouldn't want to commit hard > to any F12 dates. We would certainly re-evaluate the F12 plan once F11 > is "in the can" as it were. But we can have the "if everything goes as > planned" type targets. Yeah, though we should keep in mind it's a lot easier to handle a slip for the May release, than it is for the October release (due to the holiday season, which we experienced this go around). /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
