On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > True that spins aren't the same as features, but they normally require > a feature page for tracking. Part of the reason for this is to make > sure the spin gets promotion in the feature process. > I've looked at the spins sig page and I am uber confused. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Spins links to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JefSpaleta/SpinReleaseProcessProposal which really couldn't be a worse guide from a spin proposer perspective (it is the proposal for the sig itself to follow). I think: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Spins/SpinSubmissionProcess is the page the sig intends people to follow. I've also come to find out there's a whole slew of options in spins hosting, just the ks for example can get approved for hosting but never built and distributed as an official fedora spin. That page does mention a feature page requirement but doesn't really talk about timelines nor expectations. -Mike _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
