On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 14:58 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Here's my first pass at a very simple page to explain to PackageKit > > > users why something they searched for was not found in Fedora: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found > > > > > > Feedback is welcomed. Keep in mind that we cannot make references to > > > specific 3rd party repositories here. > > > > The initial bits are rather repetitive. Not sure it can be avoided. > > > > Under what circumstances is PackageKit looking for *drivers*? > > We may want to explain what a 'codec' is, depending on how PackageKit > is phrasing it before you get to this page. Done, thanks. > For codecs and drivers, > asking for them to be packaged may not be helpful, as: > > - for codecs, if it's not there, it's either legal or it doesn't exist I'm not sure about that. I don't want to assume we have every known codec covered. > - for drivers, we want them upstream Good point. I've adjusted this section. ~spot _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
