On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Whether or not there is room for our content regarding plugins is an > interesting question, and I think there is room before PK goes off and > searches for suitable providers. However I'm almost 100% certain that > the board voted to remove references to fluendo's store. I'm also nearly certain that the Board voted to remove references to Fluendo, I'll see if I can find the minutes from the meeting where they did so. However, here's my personal opinion on the topic: I'm cool with (and encourage) something saying "hey, you don't have the right codecs to play this, they're non-free, here's why non-free codecs are bad". What I'm *NOT* OK with is directing folks at Fluendo (or any other store) to purchase them, for a few reasons: 1) It creates a "endorsement" from the Fedora project 2) People in certain parts of the world can get the equivalent functionality in free software, legally. Simply because we cannot distribute the free software doesn't mean that it's not out there, and some people (just not including myself) can legally use it. We obviously can't point folks to it, though. _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
