seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 06:18 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:36 +0530, "Sankarshan (àààààààà)" wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
I've asked the Board to see whether any sort of policy is needed on
downstream Fedora remix project announcements in official Fedora
channels like the low-traffic announce lists. As always we encourage
community input and participation in the discussion.
Do we anticipate a need for a policy for announcements ? As in, do we
anticipate specific corner cases ?
I think the concern is simply, the remixes and communities around them
are likely to grow with the simplification of the trademark guidelines.
Having every downstream remix announce to f-announce-l might overwhelm
the low-volume list. Another way to look at it is, should we allow RHEL
and CentOS release announcements on f-announce-l? Where do we draw the
line?
oh cmon. it 'might overwhelm the low-volume list'? Why don't we see what
happens? If we find we get hundreds of posts due to the dramatic variety
of things people are doing with fedora, well, then I'll cry a thousand
tears and we can address it but taking preemptive action for something
seems kneejerk.
Well, I send a announcement three or so days back and haven't seen it
approved yet in fedora-announce list.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
