2008/9/19 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 02:03 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> If you hold private meetings related to Fedora, you better have very >> good reasons to do so and be explicit about it. It might be more work to >> involve other people but we must be making special efforts every step of >> the way to be as transparent as possible. This meeting is not a example >> of that. Rahul, and to everyone, I need to apologise for a couple of things here. Firstly, that I haven't been keeping the rest of the marketing meeting properly informed about these meetings; I'll be sure to in the future. Secondly, my apologies for missing this meeting and not arranging for anyone to attend in my place, the week or so around the meeting I was feeling pretty rough and gave Fedora very little thought! In the future, I'll be sure to bring it up at a marketing meeting or on list before to see if anybody has any issues they want raising, and after to make sure everyone is aware of what happened. This, I would suggest, should be the minimum set of requirements for anybody attending this meeting: to take reasonable steps to ensure that people from the areas they represent know what is happening. Kind regards, Jon _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
