On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:13:32PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>>>> Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the >>>>> different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not >>>>> attended which leaves that group voice unheard. >>>> I'm pretty sure the meeting was public. >>> Was the invitation public? >> >> I don't know. It doesn't really matter though. See the part of my email >> that you cut off in your reply. > > I think it does matter. If new meetings for Fedora is being organized, > invitations MUST be send publicly. I would want to know who is > organizing it, where it was held, which date and time, whether others > are attending etc. If it is a IRC meeting, where are the logs? You said > you are sure the meeting was public. Why do you think that? I was wrong in thinking it was public. It was a phone call, not an IRC meeting. Still does not matter, and you still apparently haven't read the second part of my original reply. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
