On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:36 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > If this becomes a real problem (or if it is already) we can just > create a > policy against this sort of thing and enforce it on a per complaint > basis. It sounds as if it has become a real problem. Can Infrastructure put together a policy it can enforce? Then please let this know for a round of sanity checking. :) BTW, I have two accounts (kwade, quaid), with "legitimate" reasons for having two that were not (previously?) covered by FAS capabilities. I think I see a clear path from here for consolidation, but it may not be for everyone. Folks will appreciate having some process and time to sort out the how and why. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
