On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 21:58 +0200, Bjørn Tore Sund wrote: > Sadly, the same cannot be said about the Management of the Fedora project. > Their choice of complete non-disclosure is enough to eradicate any and all > confidence that Fedora is a trustworthy platform for Linux installations. > What information they have released has been deliberately vague and, > frankly, useless. For a day or two to secure things this may be a workable > strategy. For a full week, not giving the community participants any chance > whatsoever to protect themselves from threats indicated but not specified? > This is poor management and poor judgement and reflects very badly not only > on the Fedora project but on Fedora's RedHat sponsor as well. The issue is > more than serious enough and has gone on for more than long enough that > someone higher up the scale should have stepped in a long time ago and made > sure that all relevant info was released to the community. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by management. If you mean the governing bodies of Fedora, I can assure you that FESCo _did_ ask to be informed and we told they could not be. I know this because I was the one that asked. Whether all of the Fedora Board (the only group higher than FESCo) has been informed or not, I have no idea. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
