On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: >> Sorry to be a pain, but you still have the same problem :) The original >> page name should always point to the original content. The new name should >> be unique... for example: FedoraElectronicLabF10 > > Is it safe to assume that given that schema, Spins *always* have to have the > release version appended to it's name? > > Kind regards, Hello, There are 2 things : * Aside this wiki page naming issue is there any real issue before approval ? * Well I tend to agree with Jeroen. However I agree with john as well concerning a well maintained wiki.. But in practice, that makes hell for maintainers. During the past releases, all the marketing news sites which talked or reviewed FEL point to * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraElectronicLab I prefer to give one main URL to people, lecturers or engineers. Even if 8 months later that people decide to visit that URL I gave him/her for whatever reason, he/she will have updated contents on the page. That is why I move old contents to : * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraElectronicLab8 Most FEL users don't update their fedora box each 6 months, or perhaps they don't even follow what fedora is doing. This is the case of many CAD engineers. That is why I like one URL, less trouble end users and less chance to lose FEL users :). Chitlesh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board