Re: Business card design

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 22:19 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 11:14 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 17:04 +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > I originally advocated for that too, with the ID being boldface at the
> > > end (nice design touch I saw elsewhere).  But I think there was a
> > > concern about the text length.
> > 
> > The whole point is the text length.
> > 
> > It's not impossible to generate another key with the same ID. It is
> > considered impossible to generate another key with the same fingerprint.
> > 
> > Putting the key ID on the card is pointless -- that's what the public
> > key servers exist for. And you have to get the key from one of those
> > anyway.
> > 
> > It's the _fingerprint_ we need, because if you've been handed my card in
> > person, and the fingerprint matches, then you know you can _trust_ the
> > key you've downloaded.
> Lets emboss it round the sides :)
> 
> But seriously, maybe spread it over two lines or something if we have
> to.
> 
> Or the other approach is, also allow to print the Key ID on the front,
> and the fingerprint on the back?

We don't want to require two-sided cards just to have secure
communications.  And yes, the text length is the point, I know how GPG
keysigning works. ;-)  but it also gave the designer trouble.  I'm not
saying that's the primary consideration, just that's why it's not there
already.  Furthermore, for it to be trusted, you also need to verify my
identity with some other trust relationship than my handing you a
business card.  If you're meeting me for the first time, that's not
sufficient.

All that aside, if we want the whole key fingerprint on the card, great
-- the code shouldn't be that hard to change to make this an option.

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux