Paul W. Frields (stickster@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > Debian also makes their election data public, though they use a worse > > and much more complex Condorcet method, called "Shulze". > > http://www.debian.org/vote/2003/leader2003_tally.txt > > I don't see a huge problem with this as long as the ballots are > anonymized. Vote data is often analyzed for trends and other purposes, > and with Fedora being an open, transparent project overall, I think this > request doesn't go counter to our goals. But I think the Board should > probably make this decision. Considering that we didn't actually state before the election that we would collect, anonymize, and mine the data, I don't think it's a good idea to do that now. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
