On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:45:24AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 12:42 +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > Nigel Jones just suggested that we might want to instead provide > > > anonymized data from the release name voting, which is probably less > > > controversial since no governance was involved. You might even be able > > > to make the case that the release name election is more > > > contentious. ;-) > > > > > > > -1 to giving out ANY election data in any form other than the final > > result. We didn't say we would distribute this information before people > > chose to vote, so we don't give it out. > > I'm with Seth on this one. > Me too, though thats not to say for the next election we couldn't have a notice explaining we'd be using the data sans user identification for scientific research. -Mike _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
