On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The Fedora brand is a Linux brand. It makes sense to have some > Microsoft Windows stuff where it supports that story, such as tools to > assist migration ... to Linux. The libvirt pieces seem, to me, to be a > good enough fit and belong on this side of the bright line. Even if you want to draw the line based on intent in the language of cohesive branding...and you want to say that compared to the possible community needs for cross-development..the libvirt needs enhance the value of the brand in a way that other cross-development needs in the community do not....I'm still not sure this needs to be in the main repository of the distribution. We can brand it Fedora and it can live outside the main repo. I do not want to have to defend a special case for mingw cross-compiled stuff specifically on the basis that it is good for libvirt development on Windows and exclude all the other possible cross-development needs which the community will think up once they have access mingw as part of our distribution. And they will think them up. If we are going to special case it, lets special case it outside the main Fedora linux distribution repository and set this up as Fedora branded addon repository targeting libvirt on windows specifically. -jef _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
