On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 10:33 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > For those who didn't follow this thread, FESCo picked up the suggestion > > from this list for adding an open nomination option. The caveat is, > > they want to be candidates to affirm their commitment to a nomination > > from someone else. > > I think that this makes a great deal of sense - what if you nominated > me, and I had absolutely no desire whatsoever to serve, for whatever > reason (maybe I lack the time, maybe I don't agree with what FESCo is > doing, maybe I'm just not comfortable in that position) - there are a > million reasons why someone might decline a nomination - the person > *should* affirmatively say "yes, thank you, and if elected, I'll > serve";. I personally wouldn't call it a caveat, I'd call it common > sense :) Sure. I had written caveat because I'd started to go in to the particular use case that (iirc) Brian referred to, then I changed my mind. Maybe, instead of 'caveat' or 'common sense', we can call it a 'requirement'. :) - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
