On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:47:34AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > We've already established that mingw doesn't fit the model of secondary > arches [...] Depends on what we define with secondary arches. I thought the definition is a) if some rawhide/update build fails on these it doesn't matter, the package get's pushed for the primary archs. b) secondary archs have a different mirroring space But other than that secondary archs meant to my understanding a Fedora sharing the same src.rpms (to the biggest extent possible, e.g. grub, where grub actually can work etc) on that particular arch including kernel/glibc, or not? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
