Re: Fedora Board Recap 2008-JUN-24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul W. Frields wrote:
The notes indicate the Board's awareness of how the changes are being
made, not that it is dictating these changes, so these notes and the
policy of having FESCo be responsible for engineering issues are not
really in conflict.

I would argue that Codeina itself is a technical detail and shouldn't be managed by the board anymore which has discussed it in half a dozen meetings already. There are several other things that deserve more attention that this particular feature. Board can just make a policy decision on where it draws the line on free software and leave it at that.

Rahul

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux