On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 18:44 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > For example I guess a least a few Summit attendees might have joined the > the EPEL hackfest discussions if they were scheduled for a specific date > and time; likely same for the Spacewalk discussions; maybe even for the > rawhide discussions as well. But that of course would have required that > we say "EPEL discussions Friday 10 - 12, room 310; be there is you are > interested; we'd like to have your input how to move on with EPEL". FWIW, we did, but we didn't widen the audience for that beyond fedora-isv-sig-list. URL We pulled the ISV, EPEL, and Java packaging stuff together within the weeks just before the Summit, and we didn't advertise the sessions as widely as possible. I'd thought this article was going to be in the Red Hat Free Press (daily newspaper from the Summit), which would have helped a bit: http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/06/19/fedoras-extra-packages-for-enterprise-linux-%e2%80%93-the-extra-mile/ Time was at least well spent with the ISVs who made the trip upstairs. :) I owe more reports on this, I'll post on epel-devel-list when I make them. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
