On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 12:11 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > Right, as in every other subproject, the key is finding enough process > > to make sure we can scale this effort meaningfully, without creating so > > much that people are bogged down to the point they can't do the work. > > Interestingly, I think the recent reorientation of the Docs Project[1] > > fits neatly into the role-based organization. > > I wish I could make it to fudcon to have a pizza and beer session with > SIG and subproject reps concerning this. There really isn't a lot > here in terms of mandates or policies. I don't even need all of > projects to get on board initially for this to be profitable. I just > need enough people to be willing to try to work this way. And if its > beneficial then I expect other groups to try the role based idea. My prediction -- you'll be surprised how many people will like the idea. As much as we'd love to see ya at FUDCon, I don't think this is a requirement for the role-based SIGs idea to move ahead. People are always interested in making less mess and more grokking from the chaos. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
