On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 20:29 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > That is something I've been thinking about recently. > > I think we should remove the option for an elected member of FESCo or > the Board to 'abstain' or vote '+0' unless there is a legitimate > conflict of interest or reason with merit such as complete unfamiliarity > with an area. It seems to me that voting '+0' is really voting '-1' > without conviction and that dilutes the process... something along the > lines of 'if you chose not to decide you still have made a choice'. > Wow, you know it is getting serious when you break out the rush lyrics. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
