Re: Spins proposals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually, this part could happen tomorrow to a degree.  Infrastructure
already provided two Xen guests to do composes on.  There are some of us
that have access to them.  I used them to spin the XFCE spin.

Regardless of whether infrastructure can flip the switch on the hosting instance. Useful access is  NOT going to happen tomorrow....because access to this hinges on there being best practices guidance being developed by a peer group.  Let me be very clear. I plan to make sure the Board blocks on any more trademark approvals until there is a 'credible' Spin SIG in place with at least a draft of technical best practices inside our project umbrella.

This proposal is a general framework for which the 'new' community peer group to live in relation to existing Fedora structures.  This proposal is not the end of the discussion.  Once we make room for the Spin SIG, it must self-organize and it must make a credible attempt to setup a transparent community driven technical review process that the Board can rely on.  I'm not going to willingly hand over keys to community compose hosts to anyone before that happens.  I don't care if members of RelEng volunteer to act as the button pushers or not.

-jef

 


_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux