On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 09:48 -0500, Bryan Che wrote: > What are your thoughts on this? What about the message that this sends, that we'd rather people kept their computers on and busy using as much energy as possible to process things? Wouldn't we rather people's computers used as less power as possible, and switched off as soon as they were no longer needed? What if we could have some sort of carbon counter that interacted with gnome-power-manager and some heuristics about a person's location and the carbon cost of power in that person's area, so that you could track over time what your computer usage is doing to your carbon cost? Then couldn't we set a carbon limit and only participate on the grid if you have enough carbon cost to spare the cycles? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
