On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:09:30 -0600 (CST) Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 22:39 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:19:53 -0900 > > > > We _are_ dealing with it. Infrastructure was kind enough to provide > > > > xen instances for spins to be created on. I'm volunteering to do the > > > > actual spin creation. Rel-eng is working out a proposal (which I know > > > > various Board members have seen drafts of) for how to handle this. > > > > > > > Side note about this, if anyone wants to try to get the cd creation > > > working in a chroot or via mock it would be greatly appreciated. As it is > > > we've got a dedicated i386 and x86_64 machine that just sit there waiting > > > for spins, we should be able to do it on the builders. > > > > If only it were as simple as "get it going in mock". Unfortunately, > > with how SELinux policy works in chroots (hint: it affects outside the > > chroot), this is pretty non-trivial and is going to require getting > > SELinux upstream on-board with allowing contexts to be set which aren't > > known by the kernel or per-namespace policy. > > > > That's why I'm asking someone else to do it :) Shouldn't it just work if > we just have all the builders in permissive mode? Needless to say > maintaining whole machines just to build cd images seems silly, especially > for something like SELinux. I was under the impression that they were on-demand Xen guests. Is this not the case? josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
