Re: codec buddy, fluendo, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 11, 2008 10:40 PM, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 3:23 PM, Luis Villa <luis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Such open data does
> > > not need to be created using open tools, though of course that is
> > > preferable.
> >
> > I'm trying to think of a case where one can create open data, but only
> > with proprietary tools, and failing- I must be missing something
> > obvious, though.
>
> You mean writing open source code using an OSI approved license
> written by Microsoft, to work on Microsoft created platform that might
> also run on Linux one day once the evil penguin devil hath been
> vanquished, using development tools that are as closed as an ex
> girlfriend's bedroom, to participate in a "Open Source Ecology" that
> Microsoft is trying desperately to latch on to in a manner more
> contradictory than a Scientology Text Book?

I'm not really concerned with anything Windows specific, since
anything so tied to Windows is never going to be proposed for
inclusion in Fedora.

Luis

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux