On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 05:18 -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:14 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote: > > The argument that came to light, and was discussed on > > fedora-devel-list[2] that FAS requires "too much" personal information > > (i.e. home address, phone number, etc) in order to sign up for an > > account and sign the CLA. Access to bugzilla is controlled via FAS, > > therefore, without an FAS account, access to triage bugs is a > > non-starter. > > I'm going to trust Red Hat's lawyers when they say they need that > information in order to have the level of assurance to distribute a > contribution. If we need to get a hold of a contributor for any > legitimate reason, it'll be a bummer if they really don't live at 123 > Main Street, Anywhere, USA. As a side note, I don't think we have any process to allow someone to notify us of a change of address. > > So the question here is whether cla_done is required in order to > > belong to the 'fedorabugs' group in FAS? My vote is 'yes' for the > > reasons listed above for now, revisit with FAS2, as was decided at > > FESCo. > > I missed this part. FESCo has already decided how they want this > handled? And some folks aren't happy with that situation? > > Without FAS2, I don't see a way around this. That is, I guess something > of a click-through CLA could be hacked up, by why spend the time on that > over finishing FAS2? If I've heard correctly thus far, FAS2 should debut in some form around the beginning of March. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
