On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:30:08 -0800 John Poelstra <poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > === Contributor satisfaction === > * Schedule session for FUDCon in June That seems a bit late and a bit too exclusive to me. > * Unclear what best means of obtaining constructive feedback is > * People remain free to comment on mailing lists > > === Timeliness & Format of Board Minutes === I'd like to state that these minutes are improved from the ones in the recent past. Thank you. > * Will seek to alleviate concerns raised on > fedora-advisory-board-list@xxxxxxxxxx by holding public meetings > * Once each month > * Targeted start date March 2008. Wonderful. > * ACTIONS: > * Talk to Mike McGrath and Infrastructure team to determine > technical hurdles > * Engage community to help overcome technical hurdles Technical hurdles such as what? Every other SIG/Committee gets by with public IRC meetings just fine... > === Use of Fedora Name/Trademark === > * What is required for a package or a project to carry the Fedora name? > * Need to publish guidelines on wiki > * OWNER: Max Spevack > * ACTION: post proposal to fedora-advisory-board-list What about a relaxed trademark policy? Something like that could also tie in with the subject below. > === Post-release updates of custom spins === > * Should the board have to approve them? > * We will hosts as many spins as we have space for What determines priority? E.g. does a main secondary arch spin take precedent over a language spin? Thoughts? > * Need to determine the hosting requirements and limits > * How long will spins stay around? Suggestion: The EOL and are removed when the release they are based on does. > === Community Architecture Update === > * Max Spevack Was there an update or is this something that is being added to the Board's agenda in the future? josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
