Re: redefining SIGs (old and new)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:

On Jan 31, 2008 11:34 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"A SIG earns official project status through successful accomplishment
of objectives that warrant more prominence in the Fedora Project. If
contributors request it, the parent project or the Fedora Project Board
will evaluate the SIG's progress reports and make a determination of
readiness for this stage. At this point, it may be branded with the
Fedora name and promoted to the full status of a Fedora project. It can
join the ranks of the most valuable initiatives currently leading the
Fedora Project."

What do we call that incubation stage?

Incubated you say?  How about an EGG.  An Evolving Growth Group.

This is clever, and would be great if SIGs didn't exist -- but they do.

Again, I prefer simplicity.

"SIG" = a loose group of folks trying to solve a problem.

"Project" = a formalized team of people who are accountable to The Board for solving a particular problem.

Seems to me that the "Packaging SIG" is really a "Packaging Project" by these guidelines.

--g

--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
Community Development Manager
Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
"To whomsoever much hath been given...
...from him much shall be asked"

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux