On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:45:01AM -0600, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > Personally, I'm tired of hacking around CVS's deficiencies and would > rather work on moving to a VCS that provided stronger guarantees about > the integrity of the data. Couldn't agree more - we did have a VCS strike team to determine the next generation vcs to use, what happened to it (of which I was part of, so actually it is a question to myself ...). Maybe we should go away from this list and consult on fedora-infra/buildsys lists again on what the successor to CVS should be. I think it had boiled down to either mercurial or git. (FWIW the current CVS problem could be solved by having koji remember the file revisions over which the user has no control - it's the symbolical tags that the user can retag - drawback is that one needs koji to remember all files & revision/per/file for each build, but koji is an automaton, so it will cope with it until given a proper vcs :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpSPGte9jpcs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
