On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:58:21 +0000 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 14:58 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:40:31 -0500 > > David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I don't believe it's realistic to make changes to the hosting and > > > mirroring arrangements either -- let's stick with the plan of keeping > > > them in the 'normal tree' which you called a last resort. > > > > > > We'll plan to have each spin ready on time, so it can go out fairly > > > much synchronously with the i386 and x86_64 releases -- and more to > > > the point, with precisely the same package set. If for some reason we > > > slip, let's impose a rule that we may not ship any packages in the > > > PPC spin which are not in rawhide (for the RCs) or f9-updates (for > > > the release). > > > > > > OK? > > > > This seems a reasonable compromise all together. I can be happy with > > this for Fedora 9. Hopefully by the time 9 is let loose, we'll have > > had at least one other full fledged secondary arch up and running and > > proving that the method can work. > > I suspect this is going to work a whole lot better if I have commit > access to anaconda, kudzu, rhpl, booty, etc. > > At the moment, the round-trip time between me generating a patch to > something like kudzu and seeing it in a testable rawhide build is > somewhat suboptimal. > > I don't mean to complain -- I know people are busy and have better > things to do than commit my patches and kick off builds so that I can > get on with testing rawhide. But people are going to be busy in the > run-up to te releases too, when I most want my fixes to be getting into > builds promptly. > > So it's probably best if I can be a little more self-sufficient in that > respect, by having commit access to both upstream and package > repositories and being able to do builds (at least for rawhide). Please. > > Actually, we've spoken often of "arch teams" having commit access to > _all_ packages. Is that feasible? Perhaps with FAS2. I don't believe it is right now. Though considering I have commit access to everything already, adding you would cover the whole team! josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
