On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 08:42 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 13:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > >> I think we should link to RPM Fusion (the free part) in the future if and > > >> when it's up and running from codeina > > > > > > ... in what way? The codeina codec list is included in the packaging. > > > > In the initial dialog box perhaps? I don't know what would be the most > > appropriate thing to do. > > You cannot link to livna/RPM Fusion from within a package, RH Legal was > very clear on that. You can link to the Fedoraproject.org page that > links to it, but not directly to it. Any such fp.o page, then, should be concise and emphasize the importance of free formats once again. Making the change to codeina in this case is pretty trivial once that page is up to snuff. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
