Re: Why 'secondary architectures'?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:26:23 -0700
"Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Nov 11, 2007 6:21 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 14:06 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > Now that Fedora 8 is out, I'd like to make a suggestion with regard to
> > > PPC.  It's no secret that we've been talking about dropping PPC. First
> > > it was all together, then it was so that it could be come a secondary
> > > arch.  So far, we've failed to execute.
> >
> > Digressing from the technical side, I'd like to properly understand your
> > motivation. _Why_ do you want to do this?
> >
> ... Long rant snipped ...
> 
> I would say that David is volunteering to run the PPC SIG then.

He's been doing that for a long time already.

josh

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux