Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 06:50 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
May-be it would be helpful, if Fedora's EULA was added a sentence
stating a default license. Say, something similar to "unless otherwise
stated, Fedora *.specs are considered to be licensed <to be
specified>".
I don't disagree with this, but amending the EULA is PAINFUL.
Essentially, we'd have to get everyone to resign it, and that would be
after Red Hat legal spits it out. We're talking about months of pain, at
a minimum.
Everyone would have to resign it? Why?
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board