On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:13:18 -0400 (EDT) Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But really, how deeply should we care? Maybe it's best to ask Spot > to make a call. He's "the licensing guy". Let him make a sensible > decision and move on. While it's great to define a policy for Fedora, I think some of the pressure on this issue is coming from places where Fedora maintainers have taken specs from and modified them enough to work in Fedora. Sometimes there is attribution, sometimes there isn't. This led the jpackage folks to explicitly license their specs, not sure what other projects would do. Personally I think this is a different issue than what /we/ should license our specs from. I think we need to have a clear guideline that states if we took a spec either in part or in whole from some other project, attribution should be given in the spec itself. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
