On 8/27/07, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Still not true. There are exceptions. Else a few current Fedora > packages, which conflict explicitly, could not be in the collection. > Other packages live on happily with bugs filed but no fix for a very > long time. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts Exceptions prove the rule. However, in the case of rpm and other pieces of technology we acknowledge as critical, I think we have to be exceedingly careful. We must insist that secondary implementations in fedora avoid conflicts with the primary implementation that the distribution relies on. -jef _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
