Re: Fedora Board Recap 2007-JUL-31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Spaleta wrote:

I'm still interested in taking it further and trying to find a way to
give everyone who is working with our tools and our content to raise
their hand and say they stand among a group of peer projects as part
of a larger effort.  We can't have these project advertise fedora as a
mark, but I'll be damned if we can't find a way to have Fedora and all
these projects advertise..community.

Right. With generic logos package we can solve one of the requirements for derivatives which is to distinguish themselves as a different brand and effort from Fedora so that they can add packages outside the distribution for whatever reasons and redistribute it to other folks.

One of the other mutually beneficial requirements is to help a derivative declare themselves as based on Fedora. Not Fedora. Just based on it. This would come under fair use regardless of the rights and restrictions on the trademark guidelines but we can benefit from making it easier for derivatives to do this.

Maybe another logos package and exposing that as a easy to use functionality in live cd tools, pungi, revisor, wevisor etc to replace fedora-logos with either generic logos or derivative logos package or custom feed the images dynamically without even building a rpm package.

Rahul

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux