On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 10:19 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Ha, so we have 2 camps: > 1. Let's not decide, until legal says it's ok. > 2. Let's not take it to legal, until we're sure we want to try to do this. If the vote lands with the first camp, I might hand-off the "talk with Legal" responsibility. I'm very cautious about when I use my "Fishing Expedition With Legal" tickets, I don't have enough to share with everyone. > fwiw, the board did ask for such clarification from Mark, and from > initial comments, looks like this may be something we can do. No > commitment, mind you, partly because we don't have the necessary > implementation details sorted out yet. For the edification of the current Board, can anyone find this thread in the archives and expose it on f-board-l for us to peruse? Again, I'd like to know _exactly_ what has been asked and answered of Mark before I go asking anything again. Been there, done that, don't want to do it no more. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
