I replied to some parts of this mail in the reply to jwb already. Some more here: On 16.07.2007 22:02, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> There was the idea to rename fedora-advisory-list to fedora-project >> list. But fedora-advisory-list works well, so maybe it's better to not >> touch it... Should we nevertheless create a fedora-project list as >> discussion list for Fedora-wide things where different groups >> (packagers, art, docs, EPEL, ...) can share informations -- we don't >> have such a place currently and some people seem to miss it > There is really no specific advisory board group anymore. This list is > open to all so a name change might be better and fedora-project list > sounds good. Do we need a fedora-ramblings list for random rants and news? I fear this will become a problem. I'll think about it some more; see also my to-be-written reply to Karsten (not sure yet if I'll find enough time for that today) > [...] >> === fedora-list === >> This is mostly a list where users help he other. fedora-users would thus >> be a proper name that would make its use obvious. But would renaming be >> worth the trouble? Maybe keep it in mind for the longer term > Rename isn't worth the trouble IMO. +1, nevertheless I wanted to list it > [...] >> * fedora-art >> * fedora-websites Gone from proposal. > We need this. This has a active team with many art specific discussion. > >> * fedora-xen > Rename to fedora-virtualization since we now have kvm and shortly will > have lguest too. +1 BTW, sorry, I just mentioned this idea in another mail -- seems that was not my idea and was instead your one which my mind picked up now (I skimmed over your mail some hours ago already) >> * should we have a official mailing list coordinator that has to ACK >> new mailing lists? > FESCo might designate someone here. Warren Togami or Thomas Chung might > be interested. I think this is something for the Board and FESCo. But I more and more think we need such a coordinator, to avoid that each and every SIG gets a own list. Sure, for some SIGs it makes sense, but I find it unhelpful that for example the games-sig has it's own list, but doesn't report much of their doings on the normal lists -- that IMHO would be crucial to make sure non-lists members that maintain games in Fedora know what's up (easy information flow) without following yet another mailing list. >> Suggested settings (can all be found on the first mailman settings page) >> * the reply-to should not be modified by mailman (first_strip_reply_to >> = no) >> * the reply-to should point to the list (reply_goes_to_list = this list) >> * no explicit Reply-to-Address (reply_to_address = <empty> ) >> * no tagging (subject_prefix = <empty> ) > [...] > * Clean up web interface messages. Some of them refer to core and extras > for example and nearly all of them have not been updated for years. Added to the proposal (as FIXME for now). CU knurd _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
