Re: [Fwd: License issue with iText and releated packages]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 18:09 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Given this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236309#c3
> 
> ...is there any merit in FPC asking package maintainers to go through
> their Java-including packages looking for similar issues?  Or even
> just
> having FPC issue a statement reiterating the need for maintainers to
> check the code they're entering into the repos? 

In general we're all pretty careful.  I think this is probably an
isolated case because the excellent work done by both JPackage and our
maintainers almost always results in clean packages -- both from a build
and packaging granularity standpoint and from a licencing one.

Andrew

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux