On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 22:29 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:35:22 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 09:23 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Thursday 14 June 2007 08:01:37 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > I have to call BS on this one. > > > > > > > > Ask yourself. Is anything about this really working? > > > > > > Yes, for many things and many cases things are working quite well. There are > > > some rough spots, nobody is saying it's perfect, but to say that it's > > > completely non-functional is just bologna. > > Then let me ask directly: How could it happen that this kernel package > > was released? > > > > My interpretation of this incident: "system failure". > > Whatever this system is - be it automatic, be it human. > > > > IMO, EVR breakages and repo inconsistency are avoidable and would expect > > Michael to have scripts for this. > > As I don't completely understand that sentence, just to make one thing > clear, I'm not involved in F7 update releases at all. You have been posting reports of EVR breakages/broken package deps in FC+FE for a long time and therefore thought you to have scripts to perform such repo-consistency checks automatically. Running such a script on a repo + "the packages to be pushed" before pushing the new packages would have caught this case. Ralf _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
